This paper sets out a strategy calling for a radical overhaul of the manner in which both the EU and aspiring member states define and implement what the Copenhagen criteria refer to as the “Rule of Law” in pursuit of the elusive goal of sustainability. While pointing to the limits of the current “anatomical method” centered on legal and institutional checklists, the paper stresses the existence of a fundamental dilemma between, on the one hand, the need to be more ambitious in assessing and promoting the “Rule of Law” and, on the other hand, the imperative to exercise humility and restraint regarding the claims made by the EU on behalf of “Rule of Law” assessment and assistance.
Rethinking Europe's « Rule of Law » and Enlargement Agenda
The Fundamental Dilemma
Policy analysis
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Policy analysis22 June 2026182 Pages -
Policy analysis28 April 202650 Pages -
Policy analysis20 April 2026106 Pages -
Policy analysis9 December 202562 Pages -
8 December 202574 Pages
Related publications
-
18 December 202475 Pages -
29 April 202470 Pages -
2 December 2022156 Pages -
Policy analysis22 October 202174 Pages -
19 May 202191 Pages -
2 February 202192 Pages -
Policy analysis19 June 2019130 Pages